ISSN 1004-6879

CN 13-1154/R

 

承德医学院学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 18-21.

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字减影血管造影联合Fogarty球囊导管取栓术在动脉联合血栓中的应用

李小东, 严晓薇, 刘飞, 姜洪涛, 冯向春, 于昌玉, 王培*   

  1. 承德医学院附属医院手足外科,河北承德 067000
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-02 发布日期:2022-07-30
  • 通讯作者: *
  • 基金资助:
    承德市科学技术研究与发展计划项目(201801A037); 河北省卫生厅课题(20160010)

Application of DSA Combined with Fogarty Balloon Catheter Removal in Arterial Combined Thrombosis

LI Xiao-dong, YAN Xiao-wei, LIU Fei, JIANG Hong-tao, FENG Xiang-chun, YU Chang-yu, WANG Pei*   

  1. Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, 067000, China
  • Received:2021-06-02 Published:2022-07-30

摘要: 目的 比较数字减影血管造影(digital subtraction angiography,DSA)引导下Fogarty球囊导管取栓术、切开探查术在动脉危象联合血栓中应用的效果。方法 回顾性分析2012年9月~2020年5月承德医学院附属医院收治的35例在断肢再植术后出现血管危象,经高频超声诊断为联合血栓的患者临床数据。依据手术方式分为微创组(即DSA引导下Fogarty球囊导管取栓术,12例),开放组(即切开探查术,23例),对手术前、中、后各项指标进行比较研究。结果 入院时两组一般资料差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性;对血管再通畅时间、术中手术时间、术中出血量进行比较,微创组显著低于开放组(P<0.05);对术后再次栓塞率、术后截肢率进行比较,微创组显著低于开放组(P<0.05);术后9个月随访患肢功能优良率二组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对住院医疗费进行比较,开放组显著低于微创组(P<0.05)。结论 DSA引导下Fogarty球囊导管取栓术处理动脉危象联合血栓,可避免断端修复区域二次损伤,并发症发生率低,早期疗效确切,但会增加医疗费用。

关键词: Fogarty球囊导管, 数字减影血管造影, 离断肢体, 动脉危象, 血栓

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of DSA-guided Fogarty balloon catheter removal and incision exploration in the treatment of arterial crisis combined with thrombosis. Methods Analysis rstrospectively the clinical data of 35 cases who had vascular crisis after replantation of severed limbs and diagnosed with combined thrombosis by high-frequency ultrasound from September 2012 to May 2020 in the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University. According to the surgical method, the cases divided into minimally invasive group (fogarty balloon catheter thrombectomy under DSA guidance, 12 cases) and open group (incision and exploratory surgery, 23 cases). A comparative study of various indicators before, during and after the operation. Results There was no statistically significant difference in general information between the two groups at admission (P>0.05), and they were comparable; the time to vascular repatency, intraoperative operation time, and intraoperative blood loss in the minimally invasive group were significantly lower than those in the open group (P<0.05); the postoperative re-embolization rate and postoperative amputation rate of the minimally invasive group were significantly lower than those of the open group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of good limb function at 9 months postoperative follow-up (P>0.05); the hospitalization medical expenses open group was significantly lower than the minimally invasive group (P>0.05). Conclusion DSA-guided Fogarty balloon catheter removal for arterial crisis combined with thrombosis can avoid secondary damage to the repair area of the broken end, with low incidence of complications and definite early curative effect, but will increase medical costs.

Key words: fogarty balloon catheter, digital subtraction angiography, severed limb, arterial crisis, thrombosis

中图分类号: