蜱传人兽共患无形体和立克次体的分子生物学鉴定

承德医学院学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 190-195.

蜱传人兽共患无形体和立克次体的分子生物学鉴定

任晴¹, 李美辰², 张家铭¹, 杜娈英¹, 郭文平^1*, 谢广成^1*

1.承德医学院基础医学院, 河北承德 067000;2.秦皇岛市第一医院, 河北承德 067000

收稿日期:2022-09-29 出版日期:2023-06-10 发布日期:2023-09-15
通讯作者: *
基金资助:
河北省高等学校青年拔尖人才计划项目（BJ2020024）; 承德医学院高层次人才科研启动基金（202001）; 承德医学院省级大学生创新创业训练计划项目（2021012）

Molecular Identification of Tick-borne Zoonotic Anaplasma and Rickettsia in Ticks

REN Qing¹, LI Mei-chen², ZHANG Jia-ming¹, DU Luan-ying¹, GUO Wen-ping^1,*, XIE Guang-cheng^1,*

1. School of Basic Medicine, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, 067000, China;
2. First hospital of Qinhuangdao, Chengde, Hebei, 067000, China

Received:2022-09-29 Online:2023-06-10 Published:2023-09-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的调查承德市周边农村蜱传立克次氏体目细菌的流行现状,分析承德地区人兽共患无形体和立克次体的种类及其遗传特征,为蜱传立克次氏体病的防控提供理论依据。方法本研究从承德市三沟镇和六沟镇采集蜱并提取总DNA,使用巢氏PCR技术扩增16S rRNA基因进行立克次氏体目细菌的鉴定。扩增无形体（Anaplasma）的热休克蛋白（groEL）基因和立克次体（Rickettsia）的外膜蛋白A（ompA）基因,测序后对序列进行同源性与系统发生分析,对蜱传人兽共患无形体和立克次体病原体进行鉴定。结果在三沟镇和六沟镇共采集到336只蜱,经鉴定均为长角血蜱。蜱感染无形体的阳性率为25.3%（85/336）,立克次体的阳性率为17.3%（58/336）,蜱感染无形体的阳性率显著高于立克次体（P=0.01）。无形体包括山羊无形体（Anaplasma capra）和羊无形体（Anaplasma ovis）,阳性率分别为8.3%（28/336）和17.0%（57/336）; 立克次中西伯利亚立克次体（Rickettsia sibirica）的阳性率为3.6%（12/58）,饶氏立克次体（Rickettsia raoultii）的阳性率为6.3%（21/58）,Candidatus Rickettsia jingxinensis的阳性率7.4%（25/58）。结论承德市长角血蜱携带有2种人兽共患无形体与3种立克次氏体,表明承德周边农村地区流行立克次氏体目细菌具有较高的遗传多样性,需加强承德地区蜱与蜱传病原体的监测与防控。

关键词: 无形体, 立克次体, 同源性分析, 系统发生分析, 蜱

Abstract: Objective To investigate the prevalence and species of tick-borne Rickettsiales in rural areas of Chengde City, and to provide a theoretical basis for the prevention and control of diseases caused by tick-borne Rickettsiales. Methods Total DNA was extracted from ticks collected from Sangou Town and Liugou Town of Chengde City, and the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by nested PCR to identify Rickettsiae bacteria. The heat shock protein(groEL) gene of Anaplasma and outer membrane protein A (ompA) gene of Rickettsia were amplified and sequenced for homology and phylogenetic analysis to identify the pathogens of tick-borne zoonotic Anaplasma and Rickettsia. Results A total of 336 ticks were collected from Sangou Town and Liugou Town, and all of them were identified as Haemaphysalis longicornis. The positive rate of Anaplasma was 25.3% (85/336) in ticks and 17.3% (58/336) in Rickettsia. The positive rate of Anaplasma in ticks was significantly higher than that in Rickettsia (P=0.01). The positive rates of Anaplasma capra and Anaplasma ovis were 8.3% (28/336) and 17.0% (57/336), respectively. The positive rate of Rickettsia sibirica and Rickettsia raoultii was 3.6% (12/58) and 6.3% (21/58), respectively. The positive rate of Candidatus Rickettsia jingxinensis was 7.4% (25/58). Conclusion Two zoonotic Anaplasma and three Rickettsia species were identified in H. longicornis in Chengde, indicating that Rickettsiae bacteria prevalent in rural areas around Chengde present high genetic diversity. And it is necessary to strengthen the monitoring and prevention and control of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in Chengde.

Key words: Anaplasma, Rickettsia, homology analysis, phylogenetic tree, ticks

中图分类号:

R372

任晴, 李美辰, 张家铭, 杜娈英, 郭文平, 谢广成*. 蜱传人兽共患无形体和立克次体的分子生物学鉴定[J]. 承德医学院学报, 2023, 40(3): 190-195.

REN Qing, LI Mei-chen, ZHANG Jia-ming, DU Luan-ying, GUO Wen-ping, XIE Guang-cheng. Molecular Identification of Tick-borne Zoonotic Anaplasma and Rickettsia in Ticks[J]. Journal of Chengde Medical University, 2023, 40(3): 190-195.

参考文献

[1] 马米玲,李海建,庆保平. 我国蜱媒传播的人兽共患病[J]. 青海畜牧兽医杂志,2012,42(1):41-42.
[2] Fang LQ, Liu K, Li XL, et al.Emerging tick-borne infections in mainland China: an increasing public health threat[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2015, 15(12): 1467-1479.
[3] 吴东兴,李淑艳,包黎明,等. 蜱传人兽共患无形体科属病原体研究[J]. 畜禽业,2021,32(11):8-10.
[4] 韩婧,贺真,邵中军. 常见蜱传立克次体的研究进展[J].中华卫生杀虫药械,2022,28(01):86-89.
[5] Kilpatrick AM, Randolph SE.Drivers, dynamics, and control of emerging vector-borne zoonotic diseases[J]. Lancet, 2012, 380(9857): 1946-1955.
[6] Rar VA, Livanova NN, Panov VV, et al.Genetic diversity of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia in the Asian part of Russia[J]. Ticks Tick Borne Dis, 2010, 1(1): 57-65.
[7] Guo WP, Huang B, Zhao Q, et al.Human-pathogenic Anaplasma spp., and Rickettsia spp. in animals in Xi'an, China[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2018, 12(11): e0006916.
[8] Guo WP, Wang YH, Lu Q, et al.Molecular detection of spotted fever group rickettsiae in hard ticks, northern China[J]. Transbound Emerg Dis, 2019, 66(4): 1587-1596.
[9] Zhao GP, Wang YX, Fan ZW, et al.Mapping ticks and tick-borne pathogens in China[J]. Nat Commun, 2021, 12(1):1075.
[10] 陈泽,杨晓军,杨晓红,等. 中国蜱类地理分布及区系分析[J]. 四川动物,2008,27(5):820-823.
[11] Zou Y, Wang Q, Fu Z, et al.Detection of spotted fever group Rickettsia in Haemaphysalis longicornis from Hebei Province, China[J]. J Parasitol, 2011, 97(5): 960-962.
[12] Li H, Zheng YC, Ma L, et al.Human infection with a novel tick-borne Anaplasma species in China: a surveillance study[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2015, 15(6): 663-670.
[13] Chochlakis D, Ioannou I, Tselentis Y, et al.Human anaplasmosis and Anaplasma ovis variant[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2010,16(6): 1031-1032
[14] Guo WP, Wang YH, Lu Q, et al.Molecular detection of spotted fever group rickettsiae in hard ticks, northern China[J]. Transbound Emerg Dis, 2019, 66(4): 1587-1596.
[15] Guo WP, Huang B, Zhao Q, et al.Human-pathogenic Anaplasma spp., and Rickettsia spp. in animals in Xi'an, China[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2018, 12(11): e0006916.