剪切波弹性成像联合三维能量多普勒对胎儿生长受限的诊断价值

承德医学院学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 21-23.

剪切波弹性成像联合三维能量多普勒对胎儿生长受限的诊断价值

屈广禄¹, 范嘉琦¹, 崔竞月², 李悦玮², 白显树², 王洪^2,*

1.承德医学院研究生学院,河北承德 067000;
2.承德医学院第二临床医院超声诊断科,河北承德 067000

收稿日期:2024-07-16 出版日期:2025-02-10 发布日期:2025-02-24
通讯作者: *

The Diagnostic Value of Shear Wave Elastography in Conjunction with Three-Dimensional Power Doppler for Fetal Growth Restriction

QU Guang-lu FAN Jia-qi CUI Jing-yue LI Yue-wei BAI Xian-shu WANG Hong QU Guang-lu¹, FAN Jia-qi¹, CUI Jing-yue², LI Yue-wei², BAI Xian-shu², WANG Hong^2,*

1. Graduate School of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, 067000, China;
2. Ultrasonic Diagnosis Department, The Second Clinical College of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, 067000, China

Received:2024-07-16 Online:2025-02-10 Published:2025-02-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的应用三维能量多普勒超声技术（3D-PDU）和剪切波弹性成像（SWE）对胎儿生长受限（FGR）胎盘的3D-PDU指数和杨氏模量值进行定量分析,并分析其诊断效能。方法选取FGR孕妇30例为FGR组,另选取同期产检健康孕妇45例为对照组。在孕25周到36周对所有孕妇进行3D-PDU和SWE超声检查,检测胎盘血管化指数(VI)、血流指数(FI)、血管化-血流指数(VFI)、杨氏模量值等指标。结果 FGR组的VI、FI、VFI以及均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。FGR组的杨氏模量值高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC曲线显示VI、FI、VFI曲线下面积分别为0.730、0.673、0.768。结论 3D-PDU参数联合SWE对FGR有一定的预测价值,可用于临床筛查FGR人群。

关键词: 胎儿生长受限, 胎盘, 三维能量多普勒, 剪切波弹性成像

Abstract: Objective To investigate the application of 3D power doppler ultrasound (3D-PDU) and Shear wave elastography (SWE) on fetal growth restriction (FGR) placenta three-dimensional power doppler index and young's modulus value in quantitative analysis, and analyzes its diagnostic performance. Methods Thirty FGR pregnant women were selected as FGR group, and 45 healthy pregnant women were selected as control group. All pregnant women underwent three-dimensional power Doppler and shear wave elastography ultrasound examination from 25 to 36 weeks of gestation. Placental vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), vascularization-flow index (VFI) and Young's modulus were collected. Results VI, FI, VFI in FGR group were significantly lower than those in control group (P<0.05). The Young's modulus of FGR group was higher than that of control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). ROC curve shows the VI, FI and VFI in the area under the curve respectively 0.730, 0.673, 0.768. Conclusion Three-dimensional power doppler ultrasound parameters of joint shear wave elastography of FGR predictive value to a certain extent, and can be used for clinical screening of FGR.

Key words: Fetal growth restriction, Placenta, Three-dimensional power doppler, Shear wave elastography

中图分类号:

R714

屈广禄, 范嘉琦, 崔竞月, 李悦玮, 白显树, 王洪. 剪切波弹性成像联合三维能量多普勒对胎儿生长受限的诊断价值[J]. 承德医学院学报, 2025, 42(1): 21-23.

QU Guang-lu, FAN Jia-qi, CUI Jing-yue, LI Yue-wei, BAI Xian-shu, WANG Hong. The Diagnostic Value of Shear Wave Elastography in Conjunction with Three-Dimensional Power Doppler for Fetal Growth Restriction[J]. Journal of Chengde Medical University, 2025, 42(1): 21-23.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://tougao.cdmc.edu.cn:8088/CN/

http://tougao.cdmc.edu.cn:8088/CN/Y2025/V42/I1/21

参考文献

[1] Cox P, Marton T.Pathological assessment of intrauterine growth restriction[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2009, 23(6): 751-764.
[2] Burns PN.Principles of Doppler and color flow[J]. La Radiologia Medica, 1993, 85(5 Suppl 1): 3-16.
[3] Giles WB, Trudinger BJ, Baird PJ.Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: pathological correlation[J]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1985, 92(1): 31-38.
[4] Trudinger BJ, Cook CM.Doppler umbilical and uterine flow waveforms in severe pregnancy hypertension[J]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1990, 97(2): 142-148.
[5] Stępniak A, Czuczwar P.3D Power Doppler vascular indices as a novel technique in assessing the outcome of minimally invasive techniques in uterine fibroids treatment[J]. Prz Menopauzalny, 2017, 16(4): 118-121.
[6] Sugitani M, Fujita Y, Yumoto Y, et al.A new method for measurement of placental elasticity: acoustic radiation force impulse imaging[J]. Placenta, 2013, 34(11): 1009-1013.
[7] Chen JY, Chen M, Wu XJ, et al.The value of placental vascularization indices for predicting preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction in different stages of gestation: a prospective and longitudinal study[J]. Placenta, 2022, 122: 1-8.
[8] 朱玲,梅丽娜,邵冰鑫. 胎盘三维彩色能量多普勒血管超声成像在早孕期预测胎儿生长受限中的应用价值[J]. 中华全科医学,2024,22(1):105-107.
[9] Habibi H A, Davutoglu E A, Kandemirli S G, et al.In vivo assessment of placental elasticity in intrauterine growth restriction by shear-wave elastography[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2017, 97: 16-20.
[10] Butt S, Gilani SA, Hanif A, et al.Comparison of Placental Elasticity and Different Spectral Doppler Indices in Normal and Intrauterine Growth Restricted Fetuses[J]. Ann King Edw Med Univ, 2021, 27(4): 541-550.
[11] Menon A, Meena J, Manchanda S, et al.Role of Placental Vascularization Indices and Shear Wave Elastography in Fetal Growth Restriction[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol India, 2023, 73(Suppl 1): 75-82.
[12] Durhan G, Ünverdi H, Deveci C, et al.Placental elasticity and histopathological findings in normal and intra-uterine growth restriction pregnancies assessed with strain elastography in ex vivo placenta[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2017, 43(1): 111-118.
[13] Ohmaru T, Fujita Y, Sugitani M, et al.Placental elasticity evaluation using virtual touch tissue quantification during pregnancy[J]. Placenta, 2015, 36(8): 915-920.