ISSN 1004-6879

CN 13-1154/R

 

承德医学院学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 192-194.

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同液体复苏方式在休克伴TIC患者中的应用

严晓薇, 李小东, 李素清, 滑立伟   

  1. 承德医学院附属医院,河北承德 067000
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-29 出版日期:2018-06-10 发布日期:2021-11-21
  • 通讯作者:

APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT LIQUID RESUSCITATION METHODS IN PATIENTS WITH SHOCK AND TIC

YAN Xiao-wei, LI Xiao-dong, LI Su-qing, et al   

  1. the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Hebei Chengde 067000, China
  • Received:2018-01-29 Online:2018-06-10 Published:2021-11-21

摘要: 目的: 探讨限制性液体复苏与常规液体复苏对休克伴创伤性凝血功能异常(TIC)患者的临床疗效。方法: 78例休克伴TIC患者随机分为常规组(39例)及限制组(39例),常规组应用常规性液体复苏治疗,限制组予以限制性液体复苏治疗,对两组患者的血气指标、凝血功能、并发症发生率、存活率进行对比分析。结果: 复苏后60min、120min,限制组的pH值、PaO2明显高于常规组,PaCO2、PT、APTT、TT明显低于常规组(P<0.05)。限制组复苏24h后急性呼吸窘迫综合征、弥漫性血管内凝血、多器官功能衰竭的发生率显著低于常规组,限制组复苏后1周的存活率显著高于常规组(P<0.05)。结论: 应用限制性液体复苏救治休克伴TIC患者可更好地改善患者的血气分析指标和凝血功能,有效减少并发症的发生,显著提高患者存活率,可以在临床推广应用。

关键词: 创伤性凝血功能异常, 限制性液体复苏, 常规性液体复苏, 血气分析, 凝血功能

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of restrictive fluid resuscitation and conventional fluid resuscitation on patients with shock and trauma induced coagulopathy (TIC). Methods: 78 patients with shock and TIC were randomly divided into routine treatment group (n=39) and restriction group (n=39). Conventional fluid resuscitation was used in routine treatment group, while restrictive fluid resuscitation was used in restriction group. The blood gas analysis indexes, coagulation function, incidence of complications and survival rate of patients in 2 groups were compared. Results: 60 min and 120 min after resuscitation, the pH and PaO2 of patients in restriction group were obviously higher than routine treatment group, but the PaCO2, PT, APTT, TT were obviously lower (P<0.05). 24h after resuscitation, the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome, disseminated intravascular coagulation and multiple organ failure of patients in restriction group were obviously lower than routine treatment group (P<0.05); the survival rated of restriction group 1 week after resuscitation was obviously higher than routine treatment group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Treating shock and TIC patients with restrictive fluid resuscitation can improve the blood gas analysis indexes and coagulation function better, and reduce complications effectively, so it is worthy of popularizing application in clinic.

Key words: Trauma induced coagulopathy, Restrictive fluid resuscitation, Conventional fluid resuscitation, Blood gas analysis, Coagulation function

中图分类号: